These ‘anchors’ are TOO RICH for being a mere mouthpiece. TV networks should not saturate the viewers with the same person and voice, this is psychic imprinting, is unhealthy and manipulative, probably politically motivated. Would any honest TV network spread the wealth? A single appearance for 30 mins makes these ‘anchors’ more than what another hardworking citizen does in a week. We the taxpayers did not vote in a government that disregards the above issues. Ask you MP about this to see their views then decide if votable or not.

Better 2 years worth of work for so many different citizens, to end up with 100 more people who will not be poor, than a single plutocrat journo while so many homeless bu photogenic and charismatic citizens left on the wayside suffering and contributing negativity and even worse.

The difference? 99 less likely to riot people, 99 less homeless people . . . do the math. If the entire workforce and hiring paradigm of these plum jobs are well distributed, we’d have less problems with poverty. Obviously nepotism or unfair practices in wealth distribution. End this form of APARTHEID.